Insights into the pathogenesis of Low Flow-Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02625-4

Manar El Kenani (Göttingen)1, M. Schnelle (Göttingen)2, B. E. Beuthner (Göttingen)1, C. F. Jacob (Göttingen)1, X. Xu (Göttingen)1, B. A. Mohamed (Göttingen)1, A. Froese (Hamburg)3, M. Puls (Göttingen)1, V. Nikolaev (Hamburg)3, G. Hasenfuß (Göttingen)1, K. Toischer (Göttingen)1

1Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Herzzentrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie Göttingen, Deutschland; 2University Medical Center Göttingen Department of Clinical Chemistry Göttingen, Deutschland; 3Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Experimentelle Herz-Kreislaufforschung Hamburg, Deutschland

 

Background: Mechanisms underlying low flow-low gradient severe aortic stenosis (LF-LG AS) are not well understood, creating significant challenges in its diagnosis and management. This complex subtype of aortic stenosis is defined by a combination of a reduced aortic valve area (AVA ≤1.0 cm²) and a low transvalvular pressure gradient (<40 mm Hg) associated with a reduced LV stroke volume index (SVi≤ 35mL/m2). LF-LG AS can present as classical LF-LG AS (CLF-LG AS), marked by reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF), or as paradoxical LF-LG AS (PLF-LG AS), defined by preserved LV EF despite severe stenosis. The paradoxical phenotype, in particular, remains enigmatic, complicating efforts to develop effective treatment strategies.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the pathophysiological mechanisms driving these distinct phenotypes, with a focus on the paradoxical presentation, to advance targeted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

 Methods: Left ventricular (LV) myocardial biopsies from patients with PLF-LG AS and CLF-LG AS, obtained during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), were analyzed. The biopsies were subjected to detailed molecular analysis. In addition, human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) lines derived from PLF-LG AS and CLF-LG AS patients were utilized for further investigation of the underlying mechanisms.

Results: Molecular analysis revealed distinct differences in pressure overload induced calcium cycling and associated kinase activity between PLF-LG AS and CLF-LG AS. In contrast to CLF-LG AS, protein kinase A (PKA) activity appears to remain elevated in PLF-LG AS, as evidenced by increased phosphorylation of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and phospholamban (PLN) at PKA-dependent sites, despite the chronic nature of the disease. Additionally, sustained nuclear PKA activity was detected in PLF-LG AS hiPSC-induced cardiomoycytes after stimulation with isoproterenol, a β1- and β2-adrenoreceptor agonist, compared to the CLF-LG AS. These findings suggest reduced desensitization of β-adrenergic receptors (β-AR) in PLF-LG AS.

Conclusion: Our study reveals distinct molecular differences between PLF-LG and CLF-LG aortic stenosis. Elevated PKA activity and reduced β-adrenergic receptor desensitization in PLF-LG AS suggest altered cellular signaling, indicating a unique pathogenesis compared to CLF-LG AS. Further investigation is warranted to identify potential targets for more effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in PLF-LG AS.

 

Diese Seite teilen