Outcome of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients suffering from peripheral artery disease in Germany

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02625-4

Vera Oettinger (Freiburg)1, C. von zur Mühlen (Freiburg)1, I. Hilgendorf (Freiburg)1, D. Wolf (Freiburg)1, A. Maier (Freiburg)1, M. Jäckel (Freiburg)1, K. Kaier (Freiburg)2, D. Westermann (Freiburg)1, J. Rilinger (Freiburg)1

1Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Universitäts-Herzzentrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie Freiburg, Deutschland; 2Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik Freiburg, Deutschland

 

Background: Peripheral artery disease in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients often results in the choice of an alternative access route, such as transapical, which is associated with a higher rate of complications. Several studies have shown a worse outcome for the transapical access in the overall population of all TAVR patients. However, so far there is little evidence of the Germany-wide outcome of TAVR patients suffering from peripheral artery disease.

Methods: All 8,934 TAVR procedures for aortic valve stenosis in patients with peripheral artery disease in 2019-2022 in German hospitals were analysed. In-hospital mortality and in-hospital complications were compared for transfemoral vs transapical TAVR.

Results: The baseline characteristics of 7,419 transfemoral and 1,515 transapical TAVR procedures showed that patients in the transfemoral group were older with 80.5 vs 78.8 years (p<0.001) and had a comparable logistic EuroSCORE of 21.6 and 21.7% (p=0.635). Patients treated with a transfemoral TAVR showed lower rates of in-hospital mortality of 3.1 vs 5.9% (p<0.001), major bleeding of 3.0 vs 7.0% (p<0.001), acute kidney injury of 13.5 vs 15.8% (p=0.020), postoperative delirium of 9.1 vs 16.8% (p<0.001), mechanical ventilation >48h of 2.5 vs 6.5% (p<0.001), and pericardial tamponade of 0.7% vs 2.2% (p<0.001) as well as a shorter length of hospital stay of 12.0 vs 16.4 days (p<0.001). However, there was a higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantations of 13.0 vs 9.0% (p<0.001). After risk adjustment, results largely persisted: Patients in the transapical group had a higher causal risk ratio (RR) for in-hospital mortality (RR=1.70, p<0.001), major bleeding (RR=2.23, p<0.001), postoperative delirium (RR=1.89, p<0.001), mechanical ventilation >48h (RR=2.05, p<0.001), and pericardial tamponade (RR=3.04, p<0.001) as well as a longer length of hospital stay (coefficient = 4.02 days, p<0.001). However, there was a lower risk of permanent pacemaker implantations (RR=0.70, p=0.010).

Conclusion: Patients with peripheral artery disease treated with transfemoral TAVR showed lower in-hospital mortality and overall complication rates. These results support the assumption that a transfemoral access should also be preferred in patients with peripheral artery disease if suitable.

Diese Seite teilen