Hemolysis after monopolar pulsed field ablation using a novel lattice-tip catheter to treat atrial fibrillation

C. Gold (Frankfurt am Main)1, P. Pratz (Frankfurt am Main)1, A. Falagkari (Frankfurt am Main)1, V. Johnson (Frankfurt am Main)1, F. Post (Frankfurt am Main)1, J. Kupusovic (Frankfurt am Main)1, E. Roth (Frankfurt am Main)1, J. W. Erath-Honold (Frankfurt am Main)1, D. Leistner (Frankfurt am Main)1, R. Wakili (Frankfurt am Main)1, L. Rottner (Frankfurt am Main)1
1Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Med. Klinik III - Kardiologie, Angiologie Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

Background: Hemolysis-related renal failure has been described after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with pulsed-field ablation (PFA). However, it remains unknown whether risk and extend of hemolysis following PFA for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) varies by platform.

Aim: This study sought to investigate the potential for hemolysis during AF ablation using a novel three-dimensional mapping platform combined with a lattice-tip catheter (Sphere-9TM, Medtronic Inc.) that can toggle between monopolar PFA and radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery (AfferaTM, Medtronic Inc.).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of hemolysis parameters among consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation using the Affera mapping and ablation system in combination with the Sphere-9 catheter. Hemolysis markers were assessed immediately before and the day after the procedure.

Results: A total of 33 patients (median age 69 years, 61% male, 46% suffering from paroxysmal AF) undergoing AF ablation were analyzed, including 20 (61%) reablation procedures. Mean total number of applications and mean number of PFA-applications was 70 ± 23 and 63± 37 (Table 1). A significant increase in lactatdehydrogenase (LDH) levels by 78.5% (197 ± 33 vs. 251 ± 51 U/L, p<0.001), total bilirubin levels by 73.8% (0.59 ± 0.35 vs. 0.8 ± 0.3 mg/dl, p<0.001), direct bilirubin levels by  49.2 % (0.3 ± 0.23 vs. 0.49 ± 0.61 mg/dl, p=0.03) and decrease in haptoglobin levels by 10.8% (120 ± 53.3 vs. 107 ± 46.3 mg/dl, p=0.023) was documented within 24 hours after the procedure compared to baseline (Figure 1). No significant changes in creatinine levels (1.02 ± 0.3 vs. 0.98 ± 0.29 mg/dl, p= 0.064), as an indicator of renal failure, were observed after the procedure. Hemolysis parameters did not correlate significantly with the total number of PFA applications (∆Haptoglobin mg/dl, r=0.2, p=0.31; ∆Bilirubin mg/dl, r=0.22, p=0.26; ∆LDH U/L, r=0.05, p=0.81).

Conclusion: Hemolysis after PFA is a frequent finding and seems to occur regardless of platform and PFA waveform used. However, in our cohort, no renal failure was noted.