Deep Sedation for Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation with a Variable-Loop Catheter

V. Sciacca (Bad Oeynhausen)1, P. Lucas (Bad Oeynhausen)1, T. Fink (Bad Oeynhausen)1, D. Guckel (Bad Oeynhausen)1, M. Didenko (Bad Oeynhausen)1, M. Mörsdorf (Bad Oeynhausen)1, M. Braun (Bad Oeynhausen)1, M. Khalaph (Bad Oeynhausen)1, Y. Bocchini (Bad Oeynhausen)1, K. Harutyunyan (Bad Oeynhausen)1, P. Sommer (Bad Oeynhausen)1, C. Sohns (Bad Oeynhausen)1
1Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Klinik für Elektrophysiologie/ Rhythmologie Bad Oeynhausen, Deutschland

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel treatment modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) that uses high-voltage electric fields to induce myocardial electroporation. Despite its favorable safety profile, PFA can provoke muscle contractions and patient discomfort. Optimized sedation strategies are critical to ensure procedural tolerability.

Aims: 
This study aims to evaluate feasibility, safety, and patient experience of deep sedation during pulsed field ablation using a novel variable loop catheter (VLC). 
Methods: Consecutive patients with AF undergoing ablation with the VLC were prospectively enrolled. All procedures were performed under deep sedation guided by a standardized protocol including midazolam, fentanyl, and contiunous propofol infusion. Hemodynamic monitoring included non-invasive blood pressure measurements and continuous oximetry. Sedation depth was monitored using the Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS). Patient experience was assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a standardized questionnaire.

Results: 59 patients (mean age 65 ± 10 years; 64% male) were included. All procedures were completed under deep sedation without conversion to general anesthesia. The median peak propofol rate was 7.0 mg/kg/h (mean 7.4 ± 2.7 mg/kg/h), with cumulative dosages tailored to individual tolerance. Median RASS score during ablation was –4 (IQR –3 to –5). No sedation-related complications, such as hypoxia, hypotension, or airway intervention, were observed. Complete PVI was achieved in all patients with no device-related adverse events. Overall, 94% of patients rated their experience with sedation and analgesia as good or excellent.

Conclusion: Deep sedation is a feasible, safe, and an effective strategy for PFA using the VLC. These findings support the routine use of monitored deep sedation as a viable alternative to general anesthesia in PFA procedures.