Comparison of Single-Shot Dark-Blood vs. Conventional Bright-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Detection of Scars in Patients With Suspected Cardiomyopathy

S. Greulich (Tübingen)1, A. Jimeno-Ledesma (Tübingen)2, J. M. Brendel (Tübingen)3, A. Lingg (Tübingen)2, K. Nikolaou (Tübingen)3, M. Gawaz (Tübingen)4, P. Krumm (Tübingen)3, J. Kübler (Tübingen)3
1Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Angiologie Tübingen, Deutschland; 2Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Radiologie Tübingen, Deutschland; 3Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Radiologie Tübingen, Deutschland; 4Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen Tübingen, Deutschland
Background and Objectives:
Bright-blood (BB) and dark-blood (DB) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) are established cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) methods for assessing myocardial viability and scarring. This study aimed to evaluate single-shot DB-LGE compared with conventional BB-LGE for detecting myocardial scarring in patients with suspected cardiomyopathies.
Materials and Methods:
In this prospective single-center study, patients with suspected ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled between May 2023 and January 2024. All underwent 1.5 T CMR with both single-shot DB-LGE and conventional BB-LGE. For DB-LGE, a fixed inversion time (TI) of 160 ms was applied, whereas BB-LGE was performed with manually adapted TI values according to a preceding TI-scout (range 250–350 ms). Corresponding short-axis stacks were visually analysed for presence, distribution, pattern, and localization of LGE, as well as transmurality per AHA segment. A Visual Presence Score (VPS) was defined as the number of LGE-positive segments (0–17). A Visual Transmurality Score (VTS) was calculated by summing transmurality grades per segment (0 = none, 1 = <25%, 2 = 26–50%, 3 = 51–75%, 4 = >76%), yielding a score of 0–68.
Results:
Overall, 66 patients (46 ± 16 years; 25 female) were examined by a dedicated CMR protocol. Acquisition time was significantly shorter for DB-LGE compared with BB-LGE (15 s vs. 366 s, p<0.001). On a per-patient basis, LGE was detected in 26 cases (41%) by both techniques, with no false positives or negatives. Accordingly, DB-LGE demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for scar detection. LGE pattern was classified as patchy in 8 BB vs. 11 DB cases (p=0.083) and as linear in 17 BB vs. 15 DB cases (p=0.157). Mean VPS among LGE-positive patients was 5.2 (DB) vs. 5.5 (BB), and mean VTS was 13.7 (DB) vs. 14.5 (BB), both showing excellent correlation between techniques (Spearman’s rho = 0.99, p<0.001).
Conclusions:
Single-shot DB-LGE seems to be non-inferior to conventional BB-LGE for detecting ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial scars. Given its much shorter acquisition time, single-shot DB-LGE might be used 1) in patients in which very short acquisition times are necessary, or 2) might be added to a conventional image acquisition CMR protocol for comprehensive scar characterization.