Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation Etiology on Outcomes After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

A. Veliqi (Hamburg)1, D.-U. Chung (Hamburg)1, T. Ubben (Hamburg)1, A. Springer (Hamburg)1, Y. Nejahsie (Hamburg)1, P. Wohlmuth (Hamburg)2, N. Geßler (Hamburg)1, S. Hakmi (Hamburg)3, S. Willems (Hamburg)1, E. P. Tigges (Hamburg)1
1Asklepios Klinik St. Georg Kardiologie & internistische Intensivmedizin Hamburg, Deutschland; 2Asklepios Proresearch Hamburg, Deutschland; 3Asklepios Klinik St. Georg Abteilung Herzchirurgie Hamburg, Deutschland

Background:
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has become an established therapy for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). The etiology of TR appears to influence prognosis, but data remain limited.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective study included 85 patients treated with T-TEER for severe TR between 2021 and 2024 at Asklepios Klinik St. Georg within the AVALoN registry. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data, including echocardiographic parameters, were analyzed and stratified by atrial functional (AFTR), ventricular functional (VFTR), and cardiac implantable electronic device–associated (CIED) TR.
Results:
Among 85 patients, 24 (29%) had AFTR, 44 (52%) VFTR, and 8 (9%) CIED-TR. 9 patients (10%) could not be classified and were categorized as primary TR. CIED patients showed higher baseline TRI-SCORES compared to both AFTR (6 [5–7.25] vs. 3 [2–4], post hoc p<0.001) and VFTR (4 [2–5], post hoc p=0.003). The annular diameter was larger in VFTR and CIED-TR (43 ± 5 mm each) than in AFTR (42 ± 6 mm; global p=0.007). RV dilatation was most pronounced in VFTR and CIED-TR (RV basal 49 ± 7 mm and 51 ± 5 mm; global p< 0.001). RV–PA coupling (TAPSE/sPAP) was most favorable in AFTR (0.41 ± 0.14) and lowest in CIED-TR (0.35 ± 0.13; global P=0.007), reflecting better right ventricular function in AFTR. sPAP was higher in VFTR (45 ± 12 mmHg) and CIED-TR (49 ± 15 mmHg) than in AFTR (41 ± 11 mmHg; global p=0.043). After T-TEER, a significant reduction in TR severity was achieved across all groups (P<0.001). However, CIED-TR tended to show higher rates of residual regurgitation compared to AFTR and VFTR. Annular diameter showed a decrease after T-TEER compared with baseline (42.0 [38.0–47.0] mm vs. 37.0 [33.0–42.0] mm, p=0.007), indicating a trend toward structural reverse remodeling. Annular dimensions differed among etiologic subgroups (p=0.035), with the greatest reduction observed in atrial functional TR. RV function remained largely preserved, with TAPSE highest in AFTR (17.0 ± 4.0 mm) and lowest in CIED-TR (13.8 ± 3.5 mm; global p=0.33). sPAP showed a slight postprocedural decrease (AFTR 40 ± 8 mmHg, VFTR 39 ± 10 mmHg, CIED-TR 38 ± 16 mmHg; global p=0.61). Major complications, including major bleeding, dialysis, and in-hospital mortality, occurred in 7 % of AFTR, 5 % of VFTR, and 0 % of CIED-TR patients (p=0.62). Minor complications were comparable across all groups (21 %, 21 %, and 13 %; p=0.88). Clip detachment was analyzed separately and occurred in 12 % of AFTR, 9 % of VFTR, and 12 % of CIED-TR patients (p=0.84). Unplanned rehospitalizations occurred in 12.5 %, 11.4 %, and 25 % at 30 days (p=0.54) and in 33 %, 36 %, and 50 % at one year (p=0.67).
Conclusion:
T-TEER proved safe and effective, achieving a significant reduction of TR in all etiologies. TR etiology was a determinant of outcome: AFTR showed preserved RV function and favorable remodeling, VFTR demonstrated signs of RV reverse remodeling, whereas CIED-TR was associated with lower RV contractility and higher residual regurgitation. Etiology-based classification may improve patient selection and procedural strategy to maximize therapeutic success.