Longterm impact of left ventricular assist device explantation on mitral valve regurgitation

O. Bhadra (Hamburg)1, S. Drakos (Salt Lake City )2, A. Nair (Houston)3, J. Pausch (Hamburg)1, C. Magnussen (Hamburg)4, N. Diakos (Houston)5, D. Berliner (Hannover)6, J. D. Schmitto (Hannover)7, S. Rojas-Hernandez (Bad Oeynhausen)8, M. Papathanasiou (Frankfurt am Main)9, E. Girdauskas (Augsburg)10, S. Patel (New York)11, A. M. Bernhardt (Hamburg)12
1Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg Klinik und Poliklinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie Hamburg, Deutschland; 2University of Utah Salt Lake City , USA; 3Baylor College of Medicine Cardiology Houston, USA; 4Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg Klinik für Kardiologie Hamburg, Deutschland; 5Texas Heart Institute Cardiology Houston, USA; 6Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Kardiologie und Angiologie Hannover, Deutschland; 7Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Klinik für Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, OE 6217 Hannover, Deutschland; 8Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskularchirurgie Bad Oeynhausen, Deutschland; 9Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Med. Klinik III - Kardiologie, Angiologie Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland; 10Universitätsklinikum Augsburg Klinik für Anästhesiologie Augsburg, Deutschland; 11Northwell Health Cardiology New York, USA; 12Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Klinik und Poliklinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie Hamburg, Deutschland

Purpose

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common issue in Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients, yet the impact of LVAD explantation on MR progression remains unclear. This study evaluates MR changes post-explant and identifies predictors of MR worsening.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 494 patients was analyzed from the VAD Wean Registry with >60 participating sites. MR severity was assessed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years post-explantation. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they experienced MR worsening. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of MR worsening.

Results

In the entire cohort, 23% of patients (48 out of 208) who had no MR before explantation showed worsening MR after 5 years, while 4.7% (8 out of 171, p = 0.01) of patients with mild or moderate MR pre-explant experienced progression. Group 1 (no MR worsening) had a mean age of 42.51 ± 16.18 years, while Group 2 (MR worsening) had a mean age of 49.83 ± 5.56 years (p = 0.05). Baseline LVEF was 47.94 ± 10.52% in Group 1 and 50.50 ± 8.69% in Group 2 (p = 0.538). After 5 years, the LVEF remained comparable, with Group 1 having a mean LVEF of 44.56% and Group 2 having a mean LVEF of 41.28% (p = 0.1). Time from LVAD implant to discontinuation was significantly longer in Group 1 (571.89 ± 515.04 days) compared to Group 2 (265.67 ± 136.66 days, p = 0.01). PCWP values were similar between both groups, with no significant differences (p = 0.7), and RV systolic pressure showed no significant variation (p = 0.6). Logistic regression identified age (p = 0.04), LVIDd (p=0.02) and complete explantation technique (p = 0.01) as significant predictors of MR progression.

Conclusion

LVAD explantation leads to MR progression in a notable portion of patients. Older age, LVIDd and complete explantation technique were significant predictors for worsening MR, highlighting the need for careful monitoring post-explantation.