Longterm impact of left ventricular assist device explantation on mitral valve regurgitation

Clin Res Cardiol (2026). DOI 10.1007/s00392-026-02870-1
O. D. Bhadra (Hamburg)1, S. Drakos (Salt Lake City )2, A. Nair (Houston)3, J. Pausch (Hamburg)1, C. Magnussen (Hamburg)4, N. Diakos (Houston)5, D. Berliner (Hannover)6, J. D. Schmitto (Hannover)7, S. Rojas-Hernandez (Bad Oeynhausen)8, M. Papathanasiou (Frankfurt am Main)9, E. Girdauskas (Hamburg)10, S. Patel (New York)11, A. M. Bernhardt (Hamburg)10
1Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Herzchirurige Hamburg, Deutschland; 2University of Utah Salt Lake City , USA; 3Baylor College of Medicine Cardiology Houston, USA; 4Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Klinik für Kardiologie Hamburg, Deutschland; 5Texas Heart Institute Cardiology Houston, USA; 6Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Kardiologie und Angiologie Hannover, Deutschland; 7Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Klinik für Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, OE 6217 Hannover, Deutschland; 8Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskularchirurgie Bad Oeynhausen, Deutschland; 9Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Med. Klinik III - Kardiologie, Angiologie Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland; 10Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Herzchirurgie Hamburg, Deutschland; 11Northwell Health Cardiology New York, USA

Purpose

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common issue in Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients, yet the impact of LVAD explantation on MR progression remains unclear. This study evaluates MR changes post-explant and identifies predictors of MR worsening.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 494 patients was analyzed from the VAD Wean Registry with >60 participating sites. MR severity was assessed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years post-explantation. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether they experienced MR worsening. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of MR worsening.

Results

In the entire cohort, 23% of patients (48 out of 208) who had no MR before explantation showed worsening MR after 5 years, while 4.7% (8 out of 171, p = 0.01) of patients with mild or moderate MR pre-explant experienced progression. Group 1 (no MR worsening) had a mean age of 42.51 ± 16.18 years, while Group 2 (MR worsening) had a mean age of 49.83 ± 5.56 years (p = 0.05). Baseline LVEF was 47.94 ± 10.52% in Group 1 and 50.50 ± 8.69% in Group 2 (p = 0.538). After 5 years, the LVEF remained comparable, with Group 1 having a mean LVEF of 44.56% and Group 2 having a mean LVEF of 41.28% (p = 0.1). Time from LVAD implant to discontinuation was significantly longer in Group 1 (571.89 ± 515.04 days) compared to Group 2 (265.67 ± 136.66 days, p = 0.01). PCWP values were similar between both groups, with no significant differences (p = 0.7), and RV systolic pressure showed no significant variation (p = 0.6). Logistic regression identified age (p = 0.04), LVIDd (p=0.02) and complete explantation technique (p = 0.01) as significant predictors of MR progression.

Conclusion

LVAD explantation leads to MR progression in a notable portion of patients. Older age, LVIDd and complete explantation technique were significant predictors for worsening MR, highlighting the need for careful monitoring post-explantation.