Programmdetails - 91. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie

Epicardial adipose tissue interference in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation depending on energy sources: High power short duration vs. Pulsed Field energy

N. Erhard (München), T. Obermeyer (München), F. Bahlke (München), M.-A. Popa (München), H. Krafft (München), A. Tunsch Martinez (München), J. Syväri (München), M. Tydecks (München), M. Telishevska (München), D.-P. Dischl (München), E. Koops (München), T. Reiter (München), S. Lengauer (München), G. Heßling (München), I. Deisenhofer (München), F. Englert (München)

Zum Abstract

Comparison of Re-Do Ablations of Atrial Fibrillation or Atypical Atrial Flutter Using Point-by-Point Pulsed Field Ablation or Radiofrequency Ablation

P. Biehler (Aalen), F. Ausbüttel (Marburg), V. Adam (Aalen), P. Hägele (Aalen), S. Hanger (Aalen), A. Pinchuk (Aalen), S. Löbig (Aalen), C. Wächter (Marburg), P. Seizer (Aalen), S. Weyand (Aalen)

Zum Abstract

Left atrial size is a critical factor for selection of the optimal catheter ablation system for pulmonary vein isolation – pulsed field ablation or cryoballoon?

P. Kahle (Bad Nauheim), J. Hutter (Bad Nauheim), J. Yogarajah (Bad Nauheim), M. Tomic (Bad Nauheim), A. Hain (Bad Nauheim), J. Sperzel (Bad Nauheim), S. T. Sossalla (Gießen), T. Neumann (Bad Nauheim), M. Kuniss (Bad Nauheim)

Zum Abstract

Three-year follow up after pulsed-field and cryoballoon based pulmonary vein isolation supports a possible effect of autonomic modulation on AF recurrence

M. Lemoine (Hamburg), S. Jaeckle (Hamburg), J. Obergassel (Hamburg), M. Nies (Hamburg), K. Govorov (Hamburg), N. Schenker (Hamburg), I. My (Hamburg), L. Rottner (Frankfurt am Main), B. Reißmann (Hamburg), F. Ouyang (Hamburg), L. Fabritz (Hamburg), P. Kirchhof (Hamburg), A. Rillig (Hamburg), A. Metzner (Hamburg)

Zum Abstract

Comparison of acute efficacy, safety, and feasibility of pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial roof ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation using two pulsed field ablation single-shot devices

J. Yogarajah (Bad Nauheim), P. Kahle (Bad Nauheim), J. Hutter (Bad Nauheim), P. Beaujean (Bad Nauheim), M. Tomic (Bad Nauheim), A. Hain (Bad Nauheim), S. T. Sossalla (Gießen), T. Neumann (Bad Nauheim), M. Kuniss (Bad Nauheim)

Zum Abstract

Pulsed field ablation: Comparison of procedural data and re-do data for the 31mm and 35mm device

L. Urbanek (Frankfurt am Main), D. Schaack (Frankfurt am Main), S. Bordignon (Frankfurt am Main), D. A. Garattini (Frankfurt am Main), S. Aminolsharieh Najafi (Frankfurt am Main), A. Steyer (Frankfurt am Main), A. Urbani (Frankfurt am Main), J. A. Kheir (Frankfurt am Main), S. Tohoku (Frankfurt am Main), K. R. J. Chun (Frankfurt am Main), B. Schmidt (Frankfurt am Main)

Zum Abstract

Cryoballoon vs. circular array vs. pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter: Acute outcomes of combined roof line ablation and pulmonary vein isolation using three different ablation systems

J. Yogarajah (Bad Nauheim), J. Hutter (Bad Nauheim), P. Kahle (Bad Nauheim), M. Tomic (Bad Nauheim), A. Hain (Bad Nauheim), S. T. Sossalla (Gießen), T. Neumann (Bad Nauheim), M. Kuniss (Bad Nauheim)

Zum Abstract