Quick Dive Quick Dive

Quick Dive: Adult Immunizations as Part of CV Care

In our "Quick Dive" series, the authors of publications from medical societies summarise the most important information and results of the respective publication. This time we dive into:

Adult Immunizations as Part of Cardiovascular Care: 2026 ACC Concise Clinical Guidance

A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee

05 August 2026 | Written by: Paul A. Heidenreich, Ankeet Bhatt, Noreen T. Nazir, William Schaffner, and Orly Vardeny

By:

Martin Nölke

HERZMEDIZIN editorial team

 

2026-08-28

Image source (image above): vovan / Shutterstock.com (edited)

5 questions for the first author

Prof Paul Heidenreich, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA

What is the reason for and aim of the publication?

 

This annual publication is designed to provide guidance to cardiology clinicians regarding vaccinations along with more detailed justifications for those interested in the evidence underlying these recommendations. Research shows that patients are considerably more likely to be vaccinated when their physician or healthcare team recommends vaccination.

 

What are the most important take-home messages?

 

  1. Respiratory viral infections are associated with increased cardiovascular events. Patients with heart disease face a higher risk of adverse outcomes, including hospitalization and death, following respiratory viral infection compared with the general population. Additionally, the likelihood of infection after exposure may be higher in this population.

  2. Vaccination can reduce CV events. Observational studies are consistent with randomized trials demonstrating lower hospitalization and death rates among vaccinated individuals. 

  3. Adverse health effects associated with vaccination are exceedingly rare and are far outweighed by the benefits, particularly in patients with heart disease.

  4. Cardiology clinics provide an important opportunity for vaccination.

Evidence for Respiratory Vaccine Benefit (Heidenreich et al., JACC 2026)
© Heidenreich et al., JACC 2026

Figure: Evidence for Respiratory Vaccine Benefit
AUSPICE = Australian Study for the Prevention Through Immunisation of Cardiovascular Events; CV = cardiovascular; DANFLU-2 = Danish Influenza Vaccination Trial 2; DAN-RSV = Danish RSV Vaccination Trial; FLUNITY-HD = Fluenza Vaccinate High Dose; IAMI = Influenza Vaccination After Myocardial Infarction; HF = heart failure; IAMI = Influenza Vaccination After Myocardial Infarction; MI = myocardial infarction; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

What are the challenges in practical implementation – and possible solutions?

 

Many cardiology clinics do not provide vaccination, and cardiology clinicians may not remember the current recommendations for vaccination. This document can reduce any reluctance to recommend and provide vaccination.

 

Responses to frequently asked questions from patients who may be hesitant about vaccination:

 

      • Should I be concerned about serious side effects?
        Serious side effects are exceedingly rare, and for patients with heart disease, the benefits of reduced severe disease with vaccination far outweigh the small risk of side effects.
      • What about myocarditis?
        Myocarditis occurs rarely as a side effect of COVID-19 vaccines (mRNA type), with up to 70 cases in 100,000 vaccinations and occurs primarily among adolescent males and young men. The severity is typically mild and almost always temporary.
      • Is there danger to patients with heart disease in receiving multiple vaccines at once?
        No. In fact, there may be improved efficiency from receiving multiple vaccines on the same day. However, for those requiring 2 pneumococcal vaccines (PCV15 and PPSV23), these should not be given at the same time.
      • Is vaccination safe in pregnancy?
        Yes. Pregnant patients, with or without heart disease, are encouraged to be vaccinated.

 

Which issues still need to be tackled that are not yet addressed by the paper?

 

This paper covers the current evidence for treatment and implementation.  Additional studies are needed to determine the most cost-effective methods of encouraging vaccination.

 

What further developments on the topic are emerging?

 

New vaccinations are about to be released (e.g. mRNA vaccine for influenza) and thus the recommendations will need to be updated frequently.

Continue to the publication:

Adult Immunizations as Part of Cardiovascular Care

Heidenreich PA, Bhatt A, Nazir NT, Schaffner W, Vardeny O. Adult Immunizations as Part of Cardiovascular Care: 2026 ACC Concise Clinical Guidance: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. Published online August 5, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2026.07.004

 

About the author

Prof Paul Heidenreich

Dr Paul Heidenreich is Professor and Vice-Chair for Quality in the Department of Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine and Chief of Medicine at VA Palo Alto Health Care System. A practicing cardiologist and researcher, he studies the epidemiology, economics and quality of cardiovascular care and has led randomized trials examining the use of the electronic medical record to improve quality of care.

Prof Paul A. Heidenreich

Document types

Typical document types published by medical societies include:

ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines present the official ESC position on key topics in cardiovascular medicine. They are based on the assessment of published evidence and consensus by an independent group of experts. The documents include standardized, graded recommendations for clinical practice and indicate the level of supporting evidence.

ESC Pocket Guidelines provide a compact, practice-oriented summary of the full guideline, including all recommendation classes and levels of evidence.

Clinical Consensus Statements provide guidance for clinical management on topics not covered or not covered in sufficient detail in existing or upcoming ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines by evaluating scientific evidence or exploring expert consensus in a structured way. 

Scientific Consensus Statements interpret scientific evidence and provide a summary position on the topic without specific advice for clinical practice.

Statements outline and convey the organisation’s position or policy on non-medical issues such as education, advocacy and ethical considerations.

ESC Quality Indicators enable healthcare providers to develop valid and feasible metrics to measure and improve the quality of cardiovascular care and describe, in a specific clinical situation, aspects of the process of care that are recommended (or not recommended) to be performed.

 

To the overview page Quick Dives

 

To the overview page International Content

Related news

This new series explores the career opportunities and challenges for women in cardiology worldwide. This time with Prof. M. Wood from the United States.

ESC scientific statement on the prevention of heart failure. Presented by Dr A. Attanasio.

This new series explores the career opportunities and challenges for women in cardiology worldwide. This time with Prof. C. Magnussen.