Quick Dive

Quick Dive: Quick Dive: Intracoronary imaging for left main PCI

In our "Quick Dive" series, the authors of publications from medical societies summarise the most important information and results of the respective publication. This time we dive into:

Intracoronary imaging for left main percutaneous coronary intervention

A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC and the European Bifurcation Club (EBC)

15 May 2026 | Written by: Thomas W. Johnson,  Nicolas Amabile, Nieves Gonzalo, Jose M. de la Torre Hernandez, Peter O’Kane, Mirvat Alasnag, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Niels Ramsing Holm, Miroslaw Ferenc, Manuel Pan, Salvatore Brugaletta, Lorenz Raber, Remo Albiero, Valeria Paradies, Ziad A. Ali, Haibo Jia, Pedro Lemos, Rony Mathew, Jun Jie Zhang, Joo-Yoong Hahn, Yiannis S. Chiatzizisis, Francesco Burzotta, Adrian P. Banning, Giulio Guagliumi, David Hildick-Smith, Alaide Chieffo, Takashi Akasaka, Gary Mintz, Yves Louvard, Jens Flensted Lassen, and Goran Stankovic

By:

Martin Nölke

HERZMEDIZIN editorial team

 

2026-07-10

Image source (image above): vovan / Shutterstock.com (edited)

5 questions for the first author

Dr Tom Johnson, Bristol Heart Institute, UK

What is the reason for and aim of the publication?

 

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main disease is technically complex and clinically high-risk. Intracoronary imaging (ICI) guidance for left main PCI has gained the highest guideline recommendation for both acute and chronic coronary syndrome patients. Despite this endorsement, our consensus statement recognises the needs of the interventional community in supporting the effective adoption of ICI to guide and optimise left main PCI.

 

What are the most important take-home messages?

 

  1. Effective intracoronary imaging guidance of LM PCI requires engagement in ICI-based pre-stenting procedural planning.
  2. Metrics of optimal stent expansion are important criteria for acute-PCI success.
  3. ICI evaluation of a LM-PCI result should be the last procedural step to confirm optimisation and exclude the presence of unintended stent deformation.
Intracoronary imaging for left main percutaneous coronary intervention
© Johnson, TW, et al. European Heart Journal

Central illustration: Pre and post-PCI criteria for the effective guidance of left main stenting using intracoronary imaging.

What are challenges in practical implementation – and possible solutions?


Rates of ICI use in many regions are very limited, and, associated with this, operator confidence, combined with remuneration/health economics, remain barriers to implementation of ICI-guidance for LM-PCI. The guideline endorsement, specifically for ICI-guided LM-PCI, may lead to providers funding ICI use and in some areas, ICI-guidance has been included as a quality metric.


Which issues still need to be tackled, that are not yet addressed by the paper?


Education for PCI operators and allied health professionals to increase confidence in ICI interpretation and a greater focus on actionable imaging are required. These issues cannot be overcome through a consensus statement but this document importantly outlines best practice, identifying expectations for maximising the potential of ICI-guidance in complex PCI.


What further developments on the topic are emerging?


Technological developments continue to provide support for physicians through automated tissue characterisation, angiographic co-registration, physiological surrogates and vessel/stent measurements. Combining imaging modalities, harnessing ultrasound, optics and spectroscopy will further assist physicians in characterising lesion morphology and enhancing decision-making.

Continue to the publication:

Intracoronary imaging for left main percutaneous coronary intervention

Johnson TW, Gonzalo N, de la Torre Hernandez JM, et al. Intracoronary imaging for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC and the European Bifurcation Club (EBC). Eur Heart J. Published online May 15, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag353

About the author

Dr Tom Johnson

Dr Tom Johnson has been a consultant at the Bristol Heart Institute for 16 years and was appointed Associate Professor of Cardiology at the University of Bristol in 2022. He is chief principal investigator of AERO-ILUMIEN-V, a multinational OCT-guided PCI registry, led a 2019 European consensus statement on intracoronary imaging (ICI) and is a board member of the European Bifurcation Club (EBC).

Dr Tom Johnson

ESC document types

Document types published by the ESC, Associations, Councils, Working Groups, and ESC Committees (according to the ESC Scientific Documents Policy):

ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines present the official ESC position on key topics in cardiovascular medicine. They are based on the assessment of published evidence and consensus by an independent group of experts. The documents include standardized, graded recommendations for clinical practice and indicate the level of supporting evidence.

ESC Pocket Guidelines provide a compact, practice-oriented summary of the full guideline, including all recommendation classes and levels of evidence.

Clinical Consensus Statements provide guidance for clinical management on topics not covered or not covered in sufficient detail in existing or upcoming ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines by evaluating scientific evidence or exploring expert consensus in a structured way. 

Scientific Consensus Statements interpret scientific evidence and provide a summary position on the topic without specific advice for clinical practice.

Statements outline and convey the organisation’s position or policy on non-medical issues such as education, advocacy and ethical considerations.

ESC Quality Indicators enable healthcare providers to develop valid and feasible metrics to measure and improve the quality of cardiovascular care and describe, in a specific clinical situation, aspects of the process of care that are recommended (or not recommended) to be performed.

 

To the overview page Quick Dives

 

To the overview page International Content

Related news

ASE guideline on the identification and mitigation of cardiac ultrasound artifacts. Presented by Prof Muhamed Saric.

HFA clinical consensus statement on the management of recent-onset cardiomyopathy (ROCM). Presented by PD Dr A. Abdin and Prof H. Skouri.

ACNAP 2026 | Congress of the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions in Sophia Antipolis. A report by A. Dirksen & E. Rizou.