Quick Dive

Quick Dive: Recent-onset cardiomyopathy

In our "Quick Dive" series, the authors of publications from medical societies summarise the most important information and results of the respective publication. This time we dive into:

Evaluation and management of recent-onset cardiomyopathy in the current era of heart failure therapeutics

A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC

28 April 2026 | Written by: Hadi Skouri, Amr Abdin, Wilfried Mullens, Chiara Bucciarelli Ducci, Randall C Starling, Peter Van der Meer, Gianluigi Savarese, Tuvia ben Gal, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Stephane Heymans, Karin Klingel, Sanjay K Prasad, Dimitrios Farmakis, Ovidiu Chioncel, Arsen Ristic, Giuseppe Rosano, Petar Seferovic, Piotr Ponikowiski, Marco Metra, Carsten Tschöpe

By:

Martin Nölke

HERZMEDIZIN editorial team

 

2026-06-25

Image source (image above): vovan / Shutterstock.com (edited)

5 questions for the first authors

PD Dr. Amr Abdin, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany

 

Prof Hadi Skouri, Balamand University, Beirut, Lebanon

What is the reason for and aim of the publication?

 

Recent-onset cardiomyopathy (ROCM) is a dynamic and potentially reversible clinical condition that is not adequately addressed by traditional phenotype-based cardiomyopathy classifications. Clinicians often face uncertainty regarding prognosis, timing of device therapy, and identification of patients likely to recover versus those at risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). This consensus statement was developed to provide a practical framework for the early evaluation, risk stratification, and management of patients with newly diagnosed non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

 

What are the most important take-home messages?

 

  1. ROCM is a time-sensitive and potentially reversible condition.
    Early identification of reversible causes and rapid initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) can substantially alter the disease trajectory and improve outcomes.
  2. Management should be guided by two axes: LVRR potential and SCD risk.
    Therapeutic decisions should not rely solely on LVEF but integrate clinical characteristics, imaging, biomarkers, genetics, and arrhythmia burden.
  3. Multimodality risk stratification is essential.
    Echocardiography, CMR (especially LGE), ECG/Holter monitoring, biomarkers, genetic testing, and selected use of endomyocardial biopsy provide complementary information regarding recovery potential and arrhythmic risk.
  4. Reassessment is critical.
    Patients should be systematically reassessed after initiation of therapy, particularly at 3 and 6 months, before making definitive decisions regarding ICD implantation or advanced heart failure therapies.
  5. Recovery of LVEF does not necessarily eliminate SCD risk.
    Patients with fibrosis, high-risk genetic variants (e.g., LMNA, FLNC, DSP, RBM20), or persistent arrhythmias may remain at significant arrhythmic risk despite LVEF improvement.

 

What are challenges in practical implementation – and possible solutions?

 

The main challenge is the heterogeneity of ROCM and the difficulty of predicting which patients will recover and which will remain at risk of sudden cardiac death. In addition, access to advanced diagnostics such as CMR, genetic testing, and endomyocardial biopsy is not universally available. These challenges can be addressed through a structured multimodal evaluation, early initiation and optimization of GDMT, and systematic reassessment at 3 and 6 months to guide individualized decisions regarding device therapy and advanced heart failure interventions.

 

Which issues still need to be tackled, that are not yet addressed by the paper?

 

  • Optimal timing and selection for ICD implantation in ROCM remain uncertain, particularly in patients with improving LVEF.
  • How to integrate fibrosis, genetics, and biomarkers into a validated risk score for predicting SCD and recovery is still unresolved.
  • Prospective ROCM-specific registries and randomized studies are lacking. Most current evidence is extrapolated from broader heart failure populations.
  • Long-term relapse risk after apparent recovery or remission and the optimal duration of GDMT remain incompletely understood.
  • The residual arrhythmic risk after reverse remodelling requires better characterization.

 

What further developments on the topic are emerging?

 

  • AI-based personalized risk prediction models integrating clinical, imaging, genetic, biomarker, and rhythm-monitoring data.
  • Integration of serial multi-marker panels with CMR, echocardiographic strain, EMB findings, and continuous rhythm monitoring for dynamic risk assessment.
  • Ongoing ICD stratification trials such as BRITISH CMR, GUIDE-DCM, CMR-ICD, SPANISH-1, and PROFID, which aim to refine primary prevention strategies in the era of contemporary GDMT.
  • More individualized management approaches, moving beyond LVEF alone toward precision medicine based on genotype, fibrosis burden, and treatment response.

Continue to the publication:

Evaluation and management of recent-onset cardiomyopathy in the current era of heart failure therapeutics

H Skouri, A Abdin, et al. Evaluation and management of recent onset cardiomyopathy in the current era of heart failure therapeutics: a clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC, ESC Heart Failure, Volume 13, Issue 3, June 2026, xvag115, https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag115

About the author

PD Dr Amr Abdin

PD Dr Amr Abdin is Associate Professor of Cardiology and Head of the Device Department at Saarland University Hospital, Germany. He is Chairman of the Syrian National Heart Failure Working Group and an expert in heart failure and cardiac implantable electronic devices. He is actively involved in several international multicentre research collaborations.

abdin-amr-1zu1-375x375

About the author

Prof Hadi Skouri

Prof Hadi Skouri is Professor of Clinical Medicine at the University of Balamand School of Medicine in Beirut, Lebanon, and Consultant Cardiologist at Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City in Abu Dhabi, UAE. He served as Chair of the Heart Failure Working Group of the Lebanese Society of Cardiology from 2023 to 2025.

Prof. Hadi Skouri

ESC Document types

Document types published by the ESC, Associations, Councils, Working Groups, and ESC Committees (according to the ESC Scientific Documents Policy):

ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines present the official ESC position on key topics in cardiovascular medicine. They are based on the assessment of published evidence and consensus by an independent group of experts. The documents include standardized, graded recommendations for clinical practice and indicate the level of supporting evidence.

ESC Pocket Guidelines provide a compact, practice-oriented summary of the full guideline, including all recommendation classes and levels of evidence.

Clinical Consensus Statements provide guidance for clinical management on topics not covered or not covered in sufficient detail in existing or upcoming ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines by evaluating scientific evidence or exploring expert consensus in a structured way. 

Scientific Consensus Statements interpret scientific evidence and provide a summary position on the topic without specific advice for clinical practice.

Statements outline and convey the organisation’s position or policy on non-medical issues such as education, advocacy and ethical considerations.

ESC Quality Indicators enable healthcare providers to develop valid and feasible metrics to measure and improve the quality of cardiovascular care and describe, in a specific clinical situation, aspects of the process of care that are recommended (or not recommended) to be performed.

 

To the overview page Quick Dives

 

To the overview page International Content

Related news

ACNAP 2026 | Congress of the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions in Sophia Antipolis. A report by A. Dirksen & E. Rizou.

Representatives of AGIK on the implications of recent studies on guideline recommendations.

Representatives of AGIK on left ventricular unloading in high-risk PCI.