Coronary CT angiographic predictors of one- or two-stent strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in left anterior descending coronary artery and diagonal branch bifurcation lesions

M. Renker (Bad Nauheim)1, A. Arenas Macizo (Bad Nauheim)2, A. Halim (Bad Nauheim)2, S. T. Sossalla (Bad Nauheim)1, G. Korosoglou (Weinheim)3
1Kerckhoff Klinik GmbH Kardiologie Bad Nauheim, Deutschland; 2Kerckhoff-Klinik Kardiologie Bad Nauheim, Deutschland; 3GRN Klinik Weinheim Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie Weinheim, Deutschland

Background:
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) provides high-resolution noninvasive assessment of coronary anatomy and plaque morphology and may therefore be an optimal tool to support procedural planning for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While CCTA-guided planning has been investigated for fluoroscopic view selection and chronic total occlusion PCI, its value for predicting stenting strategy in coronary bifurcation lesions remains insufficiently defined.

Objective:
To identify CCTA-derived predictors of a one- versus two-stent strategy in PCI of bifurcation lesions involving the left anterior descending coronary artery and a diagonal branch.

Methods:
We retrospectively included 65 patients who underwent CCTA within 3 months before PCI of an LAD/diagonal branch bifurcation lesion at two German cardiac care units. CCTA datasets were analyzed using dedicated CT-guided PCI software. Candidate predictors from CCTA included bifurcation angle, Medina classification, carina plaque, plaque composition, lesion length, plaque volume, side-branch diameter, stenosis severity, minimal luminal area, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve. The primary endpoint was the use of a two-stent strategy. Predictors were assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Discriminatory performance was determined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

Results:
Of 65 patients, 44 underwent a one-stent strategy and 21 underwent a two-stent strategy. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. CCTA markers of lesion complexity were significantly associated with two-stent PCI. Carina plaque was more frequent in the two-stent group and was associated with markedly increased odds of a two-stent strategy (odds ratio [OR] 6.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69–25.55; p=0.007). Side-branch stenosis severity was also strongly associated with two-stent PCI, both by area stenosis (median 80% vs. 47%; OR per 10% increase 1.53, 95% CI 1.17–1.99; p=0.002) and diameter stenosis (median 58% vs. 31%; OR per 10% increase 1.61, 95% CI 1.20–2.16; p=0.002). Smaller minimal side-branch area was associated with two-stent treatment (0.6 vs. 1.3 mm²; OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.79; p=0.013). Aggregated plaque volume was higher in patients treated with a two-stent strategy (433.0 vs. 270.5 mm³; OR per 100 mm³ 1.43, 95% CI 1.06–1.91; p=0.018). In parsimonious multivariable models, carina plaque and side-branch stenosis remained independently associated with two-stent PCI, whereas aggregated plaque volume lost statistical significance. A model incorporating carina plaque, side-branch stenosis, and aggregated plaque volume yielded good discrimination for two-stent strategy selection, with an area under the curve of 0.85. Procedural duration was longer in the two-stent group (110 vs. 86 minutes; p=0.003), while contrast volume and radiation dose were numerically but not significantly higher.

Conclusion:
In patients undergoing PCI of LAD/diagonal branch bifurcation lesions, CCTA-derived carina plaque and side-branch stenosis severity are strong predictors of a two-stent strategy. These findings support the potential role of CCTA for preprocedural bifurcation PCI planning and warrant prospective validation in larger cohorts.