Sex-related long-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation in elderly patients (≥70 years): insights from the German Ablation Registry

J. Deickert (Heidelberg)1, M. Hochadel (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)2, H. Ince (Berlin)3, S. Blankenberg (Hamburg)4, F. Straube (München)5, T. Deneke (Nürnberg)6, L. Eckardt (Münster)7, J. Brachmann (Coburg)8, T. Lewalter (München)9, B. Özdemir (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)10, J. Senges (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)11, N. Frey (Heidelberg)12, M. M. Zylla (Heidelberg)12
1Zentrum für Innere Medizin Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie Heidelberg, Deutschland; 2Stiftung IHF Statistik Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland; 3Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban Klinik für Innere Medizin, Kardiologie und konservative Intensivmedizin Berlin, Deutschland; 4Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Klinik für Kardiologie Hamburg, Deutschland; 5München Klinik Bogenhausen Klinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin München, Deutschland; 6Klinikum Nürnberg Süd Kardiologie Nürnberg, Deutschland; 7Universitätsklinikum Münster Klinik für Kardiologie II - Rhythmologie Münster, Deutschland; 8Sana Medical School Branch of the University of Split School of Medicine Coburg, Deutschland; 9Internistisches Klinikum München Süd Klinik für Kardiologie München, Deutschland; 10IHF GmbH | Institut für Herzinfarktforschung in Ludwigshafen Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland; 11Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland; 12Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Klinik für Innere Med. III, Kardiologie, Angiologie u. Pneumologie Heidelberg, Deutschland

Aims: Sex-specific differences in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been described. Female sex is associated with a higher risk for procedural complications and arrhythmia recurrence. It is unclear whether these sex-specific differences persist in elderly cohorts or if they are offset by other concomitant age-related risk factors. Very long-term outcome data (>1 year) in this context are limited. This study aimed to assess sex-specific outcomes of >10 years follow-up after AF-ablation in patients aged ≥70 years, including arrhythmia recurrence, functional status, and cardiovascular events.

Methods: A total of 995 patients ≥70 years (45.7% women) from the German Ablation Registry who underwent catheter ablation (2007-2010) were included. Follow-up was performed after one year and an additional multiyear follow-up (mean duration 10.7 ± 4.3 years), using standardized questionnaires or structured telephone interviews.

Results: Mean age was higher in women (f: 74.1, m: 73.4, p=0.005). Men exhibited a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities (f: 48.4%, m: 58.9%, p=0.001). Radiofrequency ablation was the predominant ablation method (f: 84.6%, m: 86.1%, p=0.51), followed by cryoballoon ablation (f: 14.9%, m: 13.5%, p=0.52). Acute procedural success was achieved in 96.1% of patients (f: 95.4%, m: 96.7%, p=0.30). The procedure duration was comparable between sexes (f: 160 min, m: 160 min, p=0.71).

There were no significant differences in major complications (stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleeding) (f: 3.1%, m: 1.3%, p=0.074). Moderate complications occurred in 5.5% of women and 3.4% of men (p=0.14), mainly due to pericardial effusion and arteriovenous fistula. Minor complications, including bleeding not requiring intervention, AV or bundle branch block, were numerically more frequent in women (f: 3.1%, m: 1.3%, p=0.29). Non-fatal complications occurred more frequently in women (f: 2.4%, m: 0.7%, p=0.002), driven by minor complications.

At 1-year follow-up, symptom recurrence was more frequent in females than in males (f: 86.0%, m: 79.7%, p=0.014). Women demonstrated higher arrhythmia recurrence rates (f: 48.3%, m: 41.0%, p=0.025) and greater functional impairment (NYHA class II or higher: f: 58.6%, m: 40.6%, p=0.001) at 1-year-follow-up. During extended long-term follow-up after a mean of 10.7 years, arrhythmia recurrence was higher in women (f: 76.0%, m: 69.8%, p=0.20). In addition, recurrent arrhythmias in men were more commonly managed in the outpatient setting, whereas women more often required inpatient treatment (f: 62.3%, m: 35.4%, p=0.003) Women were more likely to present with advanced functional limitation (NYHA class III/IV: f: 46.1%, m: 25.6%, p=0.001) and had numerically higher rates of stroke or transient ischemic attack (f: 15.1%, m: 11.0%, p=0.25).

Conclusion: Catheter ablation is safe in elderly patients. The long-term follow-up shows high recurrence rates and relevant sex-specific differences, with less favourable rhythm and symptom outcomes in women. These findings highlight the importance of considering age- and sex-specific factors to improve AF ablation outcomes and equity in care.