https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02625-4
1LMU Klinikum der Universität München Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I München, Deutschland; 2Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg / Bad Krozingen Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie II Bad Krozingen, Deutschland; 3Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig Klinik für Innere Medizin/Kardiologie Leipzig, Deutschland; 4Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen Tübingen, Deutschland; 5Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland Bern, Schweiz; 6HELIOS Klinikum Siegburg Herzzentrum Siegburg, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie Siegburg, Deutschland; 7Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Klinik für Innere Med. III, Kardiologie, Angiologie u. Pneumologie Heidelberg, Deutschland; 8Marienhospital Osnabrück Klinik für Innere Medizin / Kardiologie und Intensivmedizin Osnabrück, Deutschland; 9Universitätsklinikum Ulm Klinik für Innere Medizin II Ulm, Deutschland; 10Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln Klinik III für Innere Medizin Köln, Deutschland; 11Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg Allgemeine und Interventionelle Kardiologie Hamburg, Deutschland; 12Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH Klinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin Bad Berka, Deutschland; 13Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Kardiologie 1, Zentrum für Kardiologie Mainz, Deutschland
Background: Transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) is associated with significant reduction of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and clinical improvement in patients with severe TR. While the procedure can be technically challenging, especially in patients with complex anatomies, the impact of operator and site experience on clinical outcomes is largely unknown.
Objectives: This study aimed at assessing the association between site experience and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing T-TEER in clinical practice.
Methods: The study included patients from the PASTE registry (NCT05328284) who underwent T-TEER for significant TR from 2019 to 2023 at 16 heart valve centers across Europe. Study endpoints included TR reduction and clinical success, defined as acceptable device performance in the absence of serious adverse events including hospitalization for heart failure, tricuspid valve reintervention, and improvement in clinical status.
Results: The study included a total of 1059 patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years; 53% female, 84% NYHA functional class ≥ III, mean TRI-SCORE 6 ± 2 points). TR was severe (3+), massive (4+) and torrential (5+) in 41%, 35% and 20% of patients, respectively. Complex anatomies with large coaptation gaps >8 mm and multi-leaflet morphologies were present in 24% and 43% of patients. The mean number of T-TEER procedures per year and site was 21. Post-procedural TR reduction to grade <2+ was similar in sites with lower (≤20 annually T-TEER procedures: 84% TR <2+ at discharge) or higher experience (>20 annually T-TEER procedures: 88% TR <2+ at discharge, p = 0.085). However, complication rates with early single-leaflet device attachment (SLDA) were lower in sites with higher experience (early SLDA 3%), when compared to sites with lower experience (early SLDA 6%, p < 0.05). Furthermore, clinical success rate at 1 year was superior with increasing site experience (higher experience: 55%, lower experience: 44%, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Increasing experience was associated with lower complications and higher clinical success rates following T-TEER. Thus, all TR patients undergoing tricuspid interventions should be transferred to high-volume heart valve centers specialized in the treatment of TR.