Long-term follow-up after infective endocarditis: Comparison of patients who have undergone cardiac surgery versus a conservative therapy with and without an indication for cardiac surgery

Elvin Jevdet Taner (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1, C. Kilkowski (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1, A.-K. Karcher (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1, R. Winkler (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1, T. Kleemann (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1, S. Schneider (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)2, T. Ouarrak (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)2, D. Sutor (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1, U. Weiße (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1, F.-U. Sack (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)3, R. Zahn (Ludwigshafen am Rhein)1

1Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH Medizinische Klinik B Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland; 2IHF GmbH Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland; 3Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland

 

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is still a serious disease, with a high mortality despite cardiac surgery and modern conservative therapy. However, data on long-term follow-up are sparse.

Methods: Retrospective single centre registry on the hospital course and long-term follow-up of patients with IE undergone a cardiac surgery, conservative therapy with and without an indication for cardiac surgery.

Results: Between 1/2013 and 12/2016, 171 IE patients were treated at our hospital. A follow-up with either patient contact, review of hospital charts or physician contact was performed in 2022. Due to lost to follow-up (n=4) and declined to participate after discharge (n=1), the final evaluation was performed with 166 patients (97.1%). They were followed-up for a median 2385,0 (between 2156,0 and 2773,0) days. 139 (81,3%) of the patients were operated (surgery) and 32 (18,7%) were treated conservatively. Amongst the conservatively treated group, 6,4% (11/32) of the patients had an indication for surgery, but it was decided not to perform it (cons-with) and 12,3% (21/32) had no indication for surgery (cons-without).

Operated patients were younger compared to cons treated patients (65,1 ± 13,0 vs 72,8 ± 15,7, p = 0,00016). Whereas hospital mortality was not different between both groups (21,6 % vs 21,9 %, p = 0,97112), calculated 5y mortality was higher in der cons treated group (71,0 % vs 49,6 %, p=0,03168).

 

 

surgery

n=139

cons-with

n=11

cons-without

n=21

Age (years, quartiles)

67,0 (58,0; 75,0)

78,0 (67,0; 83,0)

78,0 (71,0; 83,0)

Women

24,5 %

36,4 %

23,8 %

Previous Valve Replacement/Interventions

 

 

 

Aortic valve

77,7 %

81,8 %

71,4 %

Mitral valve

5,8 %

90,9 %

95,2 %

Tricuspid valve

99,3 %

100,0 %

100,0 %

TAVI

2,2 %

27,3 %

33,3 %

Positive blood cultures

79,9 %

81,8 %

81,0 %

Gram positive strains

0,9 %

11,1 %

0,0 %

native valve IE (NVE)

53,2 %

36,4 %

33,3 %

prosthetic valve IE (PVE)

25,9 %

54,5 %

52,4 %

intra-cardiac device related IE or IE associated with central access lines(DRE)

20,9 %

9,1 %

14,3 %

Mortality

61,5 %

100,0 %

65,0 %

Calculated 1 year mortality

25,2 %

72,7 %

20,0 %

Calculated 3 year mortality

40,7 %

90,9 %

35,0 %

Calculated 5 year mortality

49,6 %

100,0 %

55,0 %

Endocarditis related mortality

 

 

 

Probable/certain

73,5 %

72,7 %

30,8 %

Uncertain

15,7 %

18,2 %

38,5 %

Not related

10,8 %

9,1 %

30,8 %

Re-hospitalisation for endocarditis

81,3 %

60,0 %

58,3 %

Conclusions

These data on long-term follow-up after IE show a high total mortality amongst all patients regardless of type of therapy, but higher mortality rate after 5 years amongst conservative treated patients (71%) and 49,6% for surgical treated (p= 0,03168). The highest mortality rate after 5 years (100%) was detected in the cons-with compared to 55% in the cons-without group. More than 2/3 of deaths were due to IE. Furthermore, rehospitalisation rate for recurrent IE was also high.



Diese Seite teilen