Volumetric quantification of epicardial fat using semiautomated high resolution atrial CT segmentation in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving catheter ablation: The Prospective AFAT study

Nico Erhard (München)1, S. Prommersberger (München)1, B. Neuner (Berlin)2, F. Bahlke (München)1, F. Englert (München)1, M.-A. Popa (München)1, H. Krafft (München)1, E. Abdiu (München)1, T. Reents (München)1, M. Kottmaier (Neusäß)3, C. Lennerz (München)1, M. Telishevska (München)1, S. Lengauer (München)1, G. Heßling (München)1, I. Deisenhofer (München)1, F. Bourier (München)1

1Deutsches Herzzentrum München Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen München, Deutschland; 2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin, Deutschland; 3Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Neusäß, Deutschland

 

Background

Epicardial fat or epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is most commonly defined as adipose tissue between the myocardium and the visceral pericardium. Previous studies have suggested EAT to be an important contributor to the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as a plausible predictor for AF recurrences after ablation. However, data on EAT using precise volumetric quantification is limited.

Methods and Results

AFAT is a prospective observational study conducted at the German Heart centre in Munich with 200 patients aimed to be included.

We conducted an interim analysis of the first 75 patients enrolled in the AFAT study.

All patients received delayed dual source cardiac computet tomography (CT) imaging which was analysed using “inHeart medical” 3D segmentation to quantify left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) EAT prior to ablation (52.5 % persistent AF). The mean age was 67 ± 8.7 years with 46.9 % (n=35) being female.  Mean BMI was 28 ± 4.5. The Mean LA EAT was 33.1 ml ± 13.2 ml and RA EAT was 32.7 ml ± 12.2ml.

Median follow up after AF catheter ablation was 163 days. The optimal cut point for the total atrial EAT was estimated at 50.2 ml. In patients with total atrial EAT ≤ 50 ml recurrence of any atrial arrythmia after catheter ablation occurred in 8% (6 patients) compared to 25.3% (19 patients) recurrence rates in patients with a total atrial EAT > 50 ml.

Kaplan-Meyer estimates showed no statistical difference between groups (log rank p=0.063) as this analysis is under-powered with more patients being enrolled for the final results.

 

Conclusion

The use of semi-automated CT based atrial segmentation presents a novel highly accurate and reproducible method to reliably identify atrial EAT. Increased atrial EAT is likely to play an important role for arrythmia recurrences after catheter ablation. Final results of the AFAT study will provide further evidence to this important subject.

Funding

This study was funded by the German Heart Foundation - Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V.

 


 

Figure 1: Arrythmia recurrence after catheter ablation in patients EAT ≤ 50 ml and EAT > 50 ml


Figure 2: Biatrial volumetric quantification of EAT using inHeart









Diese Seite teilen