https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02625-4
1Uniklinik RWTH Aachen Med. Klinik I - Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin Aachen, Deutschland; 2Universitätsklinikum Mannheim Med V. - Nephrologie, Endokrinologie und Rheumatologie Mannheim, Deutschland; 3Uniklinik RWTH Aachen Med. Klinik V - Klinik für Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin Aachen, Deutschland; 4SYNLAB Holding Deutschland GmbH SYNLAB Akademie Mannheim, Deutschland; 5Klinikum Traunstein Kardiologie Traunstein, Deutschland
Background: Recent clinical trials showed that GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes or obesity and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). GLP-1RA exert various pleiotropic effects including blood glucose control, weight loss and reduction of inflammation. However, the exact underlying mechanism of how GLP-1RA improve cardiovascular outcomes is still not completely understood. Here we seek to investigate if circulating GLP-1 levels predict CV outcomes and if this association depends on baseline diabetes or obesity.
Methods: We measured circulating GLP-1 levels in 2326 patients with established ASCVD who underwent coronary angiography at baseline (1997-2000) and are part of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study. The primary endpoint of our study was cardiovascular mortality.
Results: Circulating GLP-1 levels were independently associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients with ASCVD (multivariable cox regression model adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, previous cardiovascular disease, eGFR CKD-EPI, hsCRP, LDL cholesterol, hs-TroponinT and NT-proBNP: Chi2: 421.07, p=0.003). GLP-1 provided higher influence on outcome prediction compared to other cardiovascular risk predictors like sex, hs-TroponinT, LDL cholesterol, hsCRP and eGFR CKD-EPI in a variable’s importance analysis. Furthermore, GLP-1 improved model performance of the SMART risk score (a european guideline recommended tool for 10-year cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with clinical manifest ASCVD; delta Chi2: 12.29, fraction of new information: 4.2%). Interestingly GLP-1 levels were associated with cardiovascular mortality irrespective of baseline diabetes (43.1%) or obesity (23.7%; defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) (respective p-values of interaction: non-significant). Predictive capacity of GLP-1 for cardiovascular mortality was even more pronounced in the absence of baseline diabetes or obesity (no diabetes: multivariable model: Chi2: 172.81, p=0.002; Added value SMART score: delta Chi2: 16.55, fraction of new information: 12.9%; no obesity: multivariable model: Chi2: 348.23, p=0.007; Added value SMART score: delta Chi2: 9.09, fraction of new information: 3.9%).
Conclusion: GLP-1 is a strong and independent biomarker for cardiovascular mortality in patients with ASCVD irrespective of baseline diabetes or obesity. These data suggest a possible direct interaction between GLP-1 and cardiovascular disease beyond glucose metabolism and body composition.